首页> 外文OA文献 >Shifts in an invasive rodent community favoring Black rats (\u3ci\u3eRattus rattus\u3c/i\u3e) following restoration of native forest
【2h】

Shifts in an invasive rodent community favoring Black rats (\u3ci\u3eRattus rattus\u3c/i\u3e) following restoration of native forest

机译:侵入性啮齿动物社区的转变有利于黑人 恢复原生森林后的老鼠(\ u3ci \ u3eRattus rattus \ u3c / i \ u3e)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One potential, unintended ecological consequence accompanying forest restoration is a shift in invasive animal populations, potentially impacting conservation targets. Eighteen years after initial restoration (ungulate exclusion, invasive plant control, and out planting native species) at a 4 ha site on Maui, Hawai‘i, we compared invasive rodent communities in a restored native dry forest and adjacent non-native grassland. Quarterly for 1 year, we trapped rodents on three replicate transects (107 rodent traps) in each habitat type for three consecutive nights. While repeated trapping may have reduced the rat (Black rat, Rattus rattus) population in the forest, it did not appear to reduce the mouse (Housemouse, Mus musculus) population in the grassland. In unrestored grassland, mouse captures outnumbered rat captures 220:1, with mice averaging 54.9 indiv./night versus rats averaging 0.25 indiv./night. In contrast, in restored native forest, rat captures outnumbered mouse captures by nearly 5:1, averaging 9.0 indiv./night versus 1.9 indiv./night for mice. Therefore, relatively recent native forest restoration increased Black rat abundance and also increased their total biomass in the restored ecosystem 36-fold while reducing House mouse biomass 35-fold. Such a community shift is worrisome because Black rats pose a much greater threat than do mice to native birds and plants, perhaps especially to large-seeded tree species. Land managers should be aware that forest restoration (i.e. converting grassland to native forest) can invoke shifts in invasive rodent populations, potentially favoring Black rats.Without intervention, this shift may pose risks for intended conservation targets and modify future forest restoration trajectories.
机译:森林恢复带来的潜在的,意想不到的生态后果是入侵动物种群的转移,可能会影响保护目标。在夏威夷毛伊岛4公顷的土地上进行初步恢复(有蹄类动物排斥,侵入性植物控制和外来种植本地物种)十八年后,我们比较了恢复后的原始干旱森林和邻近的非原生草地中的侵入性啮齿动物群落。每隔一年,我们连续三个晚上将啮齿类动物困在每种生境类型的三个重复样带(107个啮齿动物陷阱)上。虽然反复诱捕可能减少了森林中的老鼠(黑鼠,鼠鼠)种群,但似乎并未减少草原上的老鼠(鼠鼠,小家鼠)种群。在未恢复的草原上,老鼠的捕获数量大于老鼠的捕获数量220:1,老鼠的平均捕获率为54.9个人/晚,老鼠的捕获平均为0.25个人/晚。相反,在恢复的原始森林中,老鼠的捕获数量比老鼠的捕获数量高出将近5:1,平均为9.0​​个/晚,而老鼠为1.9个/晚。因此,相对较新的原生林恢复增加了黑鼠的丰度,还使恢复的生态系统中的黑鼠总生物量增加了36倍,而家鼠的生物量减少了35倍。这种社区转移令人担忧,因为黑鼠对本地鸟类和植物,尤其是对大种子树种的威胁要比小鼠大得多。土地管理者应意识到,森林恢复(即将草地转变为原生森林)可能会引起啮齿动物入侵种群的转移,从而可能有利于黑鼠,如果不进行干预,这种转移可能会对原定的保护目标构成风险,并改变未来森林恢复的轨迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号